|
City of Chicago Code Enforcement Tour |
|
Tuesday, 27 April 2004 |
|
The City of Chicago's Code Enforcement Department recently
invited several representatives from Safeguard Properties on a tour
of abandoned properties in Chicago. The tour afforded the
Safeguard staff a valuable opportunity to have a look at vacant
properties and the hazards they pose through the eyes of the city's
representatives. The following is a brief summary of that
visit with Chicago Code Enforcement.
The properties we visited were located in mostly middle income
neighborhoods. In some cases, it was clear that many of the
houses on the street had been abandoned, but on other streets, we'd
see a lone vacant property among other houses that were nicely
maintained by their owners. Many of these neighborhoods have
block clubs (identified by signs the members make and post on their
street corners) with people looking out for the safety of their
community, and a solitary abandoned home here creates a real blight
and a danger. Children climbed on the porch of an empty house on
one street; on another, the inspector approached the house before
we went inside but came back to the van saying that there were
vagrants in the house right then. Even as we sat in the city
van for a few moments across from another vacant house, we watched
an apparent drug transaction take place on the street in front of
the house and then move around to the back of the vacant
property.
In the various communities we visited, we saw some properties that
had been properly secured to the city's specifications and others
that were inadequately secured or completely neglected. We
also saw whole rows where the city had been obliged to demolish
houses with unsafe conditions that had gone uncorrected. We
entered houses that looked salvageable from the exterior, only to
find that a single uncorrected roof leak was destroying the
interior of the property.
The Code Enforcement representatives lamented the difficulties they
often have getting responses from owners and other responsible
parties about properties that are badly in need of attention.
They commented many times that Safeguard's regular communication
with them has greatly helped their efforts to contact servicers and
get problem properties promptly inspected and protected.
In Safeguard's experience, many servicers may have avoided dealing
with city code enforcement departments because they anticipated
that the cities would have unrealistic expectations, like requiring
servicers to perform extensive repairs or undertake curative
measures to bring outdated systems up to current code. In
reality, Code Enforcement's main focus is on efforts to protect the
neighborhoods. They are looking to servicers to address basic
elements for the sake of safety: assuring that properties are
properly secured, that health and safety hazards are removed,
etc.
Throughout the day, the issue that the city representatives kept
coming back to was the importance of communication. If
servicers are in regular contact with the city, Code Enforcement
can notify them when issues involving their properties arise,
facilitating efforts to correct dangerous or unacceptable
conditions. If there is no communication between the Code
Enforcement Department and the servicers, opportunities to protect
and salvage abandoned properties may be lost.
ACA Release #1479
|