| City of Kansas City MO Proposed Receivership Ordinance |
| Wednesday, 16 September 2009 | |
|
The Kansas City Council is considering an ordinance that allows the city to seek a receiver to fix up, demolish or sell vacant buildings whose owners have failed to maintain them. The city ordinance follows on the heels of a change in state law that specifically authorizes Kansas City to draw up its own receivership law. This ordinance will be considered by the public safety and neighborhoods committee on September 23rd. Following is a summary of the proposed legislation along with a report from the Kansas City Star. Summary
Kansas City, MI – receivership ordinance (#090762)
Synopsis: If nuisance conditions on a vacant property have not been abated within 60-days of notice, then the city may petition the court for appointment of a receiver. Outline:
KC to consider another way to address vacant propertiesThe Kansas City Council this week will try to add another weapon in its efforts against vacant, nuisance buildings. The Public Safety and Neighborhoods Committee will debate an ordinance Wednesday that allows the city to seek a receiver to fix up, demolish or sell vacant buildings whose owners have failed to maintain them. The city ordinance follows on the heels of a change in state law that specifically authorizes Kansas City to draw up its own receivership law. “We hope to use this new tool to stop the cycle of abandonment and deterioration that is harmful for our neighborhoods and their residents,” David Park, acting director for neighborhood and community services, said in a fact sheet to the council. The number of vacant and abandoned properties in Kansas City has grown to more than 7,000 in recent years. The city has tried a variety of strategies to combat these blighted properties, including requiring owners of vacant properties to register them. It has also launched an administrative court, which can levy fines against absentee owners. But the receivership law may help the city gain control of the most blighted properties. Park said he got the idea from a similar approach in Baltimore. He explained that the city could ask a circuit court judge to appoint a receiver to determine how best to handle a problem property. Anyone with an interest in the property would be notified, although receivership would most likely proceed on properties for which the owner had long shirked responsibility. “With most of our tools, we hope that it actually provides motivation for folks to do something,” Park said. But if owners fail to take the initiative, the receiver could figure out how to get the home fixed, torn down or sold. If repairs are needed, Park said, the receiver could borrow from a lender for construction work, using the property as collateral. The receiver could be a mortgage company, private investor or community development agency. Park said the city would have to be strategic in picking the right properties so as not to overwhelm the court. He said the law department thought it could start with two or three properties to get a handle on how the process worked. To view the online article, please click here.
About Safeguard
|


